Doctors in Our Society: Life Savers or Businessmen?
by Neal R. Karski
Thus we arrive at the subjects of health care, medicine, doctors, health insurance, etc. In the United States, at current times, the above stated are very significant issues, politically and socially. With the continuing health care debate and political quarrels regarding who should get what in a justified manner, contemporary doctors are now pressured into making important choices. And not only will the health care professional ponder about the income he or she makes, but the moral and ethical decisions that are carried out.
The medical field, which requires a lot of schooling, experience and responsibility, is now much more competitive and the room for error is even smaller. Many more college students are taking on the challenge of extensive curriculums to “become doctors, obtain Ph.D.’s and acquire pre-fixes”. This said, plenty of doctors are forced to take measures they’re not accustomed to, to develop relationships with their patients (think customer loyalty) or simply seek excessive treatments and repetitive office appointments to culminate as much revenue as possible. Just take a second to think about it yourself… sounds familiar?
I will now attempt to distinguish between the two of types of doctors, briefly and to the best of my mental abilities.
The Life Savers
I’ve once had my doctor cook up a three month prescription for one of my medications to prevent re-occurring charges for trivial 15-minute “maintenance” appointments. This showed me that instead of re-scheduling me monthly and adding on the bill, the doctor was rather more concerned about my well being, not the cash outflow from my pocket. I’ve had many experiences with doctors, both positive and negative, and I was able to pinpoint the differences between the ones who truly cared about fulfilling the rightful duties of their professions, and those who were solely after their self-interest. The Life Savers are doctors who know and understand the pain their patients go through… and are inspired by their ethics and goals to cure and treat the illnesses that those patients are faced with. They are the heroes of our society, who regardless of patients possessing low or high quality insurance; strive to help out of satisfaction for making others’ lives better. The money comes in regardless, from a plethora of sources, when the number of patients is consistent and the doctors retain high ratings and positive review scores. The Life Savers are doctors that can be characterized as trustworthy, reliable and communicate intently to foster a healthy relationship with their patients.
The Businessmen
Doctors… or money-making, money-hungry machines? Take your pick. The competitive industry, as I said before, has forced the doctors to look more closely at their financial pools and expunge more costs out of their patients. But not all of the doctors did so, just the Businessmen who decided their revenues from the medical profession are the top priority over their patients’ complex cases of illnesses, diseases and injuries. The Businessmen will use trickery and persistence to ensure the patient returns to their office as frequent as possible, on the pretense that the follow-up appointments are necessary regardless of the patient’s condition. They are at times entangled in the corporate scandals, bureaucratic conspiracies and may be involved in contingent agreements with hospitals and pharmaceutical manufacturers, who pay them “commission”. These Businessmen are not doctors; they’re vultures that are waiting for patients and illnesses to arrive at their doorstep and bring them yet another treasure chest of material value, not a human being’s joy of being healthy.
My advice: Next time that one should pick a doctor or continue to see one, there is much room for prior analysis and research to pick the right one.
God Bless Friends
Doctors in
by George A. Miu
There is no grandiose secretive veil surrounding the fact that an “MD” suffix is equivalent to a comfortable financial life in the
Nevertheless, there are many devoted health professionals out there, whose career choice had nothing to do with money, and who ought to be praised by the rest of us. Sadly, the practice of putting on a humane face, declaring an undying love for medicine, and laughing all the way to the bank, is an increasingly common one. At least this is how masses of “pre-med” undergrads, situated in colleges all over creation, regard the status quo.
This is folly! Besides the obvious risks involved in terms of medical competency, we are gradually inching towards ushering in a generation of doctors who lack the devotion and selflessness that their forefathers took for granted, even if the expertise is intact.
Suppose that ObamaCare, the insurance “overhaul” that has just been passed in congress, saves the government money, as we are being led to believe; this necessarily entails that medical professionals pocket less. In that case, I smell an exodus, which will result in shortages of doctors the likes of which have never been seen in first world countries.
On the other hand, suppose that Obama et comp are wrong, and that the new system will actually bankrupt
I am certain that there are scores of fine doctors out there, who are being overworked and under-appreciated. By making the process of education so mercenary, we are opening the door for opportunists, glory-seekers and greedy-types, who have no business being in the industry, and who go against the philosophy instilled by the honest individuals I have just praised. The harbingers of hoaxes are well on their way to overrunning the honest healers, and transforming one of the most crucial professions in society into a financial game. No civilized society must allow this to come to pass.
So, I encourage all of us to take action and plead with one another so that we may stop propagating megalomaniacal doctor-stereotypes, in which we fantasize of easy money in exchange for little work and much glory. I ask medical schools to reduce the classroom requirements (but not too drastically) in favor of extended volunteer time in clinical settings, and not laboratories. Finally, I ask all who are involved in the process of guiding individuals towards medical school to be more discerning in their assessments of who is truly enamored with the profession, and who is doing it for ulterior motives. The signs will always be there for those who seek them out. Drop the algorithm, and bring back the human elements in the admissions processes. Then, maybe we’ll even be healthy enough to give ourselves a pat on the back when we’re older.
Neal~Loved your debate between the business men and the heroes. Definitely agree with you guys. I'll write a post debating whether I should do it for money or the satisfaction of helping people. Honestly though, there has to be some money involved.
ReplyDeleteI disagree with the businessman aspect. Going into the medical field myself, I constantly have to defend myself as well as my future employers.
ReplyDeleteOne person told me that doctors are "involved in contingent agreements with hospitals and pharmaceutical manufacturers, who pay them 'commission'" as you put it, but picture this: a patient goes in for cancer. Many people say there is a cure for cancer, but it would be detrimental to doctors money wise (assuming they are in it for the money). So, eventually, the person dies after all of that chemo seemingly does not work. If people have cancer and overcome it, it is HIGHLY likely that they will get it again. From that aspect, wouldn't you want the person to stay alive just so you could make more money off of them the second time around?
Granted some doctors do go into the business for money, most of the "conspiracies" that are spoken about is just a load of crap in my opinion.
As for the healthcare reform, I do not believe that the government should be making decisions on things they are not well informed about. That's just like a healthcare person getting involved in politics--we don't have the slightest clue.
You should write an entry on the social issues college students face. For instance, dealing with astoundingly pretentious peers who misrepresent current events, are generally misinformed on "the issues", and insist on discussing them anyway while misusing “big” words in a tragically failed attempt to sound more intelligent than they are… I feel like you gentlemen could cover such topics quite thoroughly.
ReplyDelete